Top News

Tense First Test at Kensington Oval

The first Test match of the Frank Worrell Trophy 2025 between West Indies and Australia at Kensington Oval in Barbados has been overshadowed by contentious Decision Review System (DRS) calls, primarily involving third umpire Adrian Holdstock.

As the match progresses, Australia has established an 82-run lead. After dismissing West Indies for 190, they ended Day 2 with a score of 92/4 in their second innings, with Travis Head and Beau Webster at the crease on 13 and 19 runs, respectively.

In their first innings, Australia managed 180 runs, with Travis Head scoring the highest at 59 runs off 78 balls. West Indies responded with 190 runs, bolstered by Roston Chase's 44 and Shai Hope's 48, along with a crucial 23 from Alzarri Joseph.

DRS Controversies Capture Attention

The opening match of the series has drawn significant attention, not only for the competitive nature of the game but also due to a series of DRS controversies that have ignited discussions about the technology's reliability.

West Indies have faced the brunt of questionable DRS calls made by Adrian Holdstock, who has been officiating this Test series. The team, led by Roston Chase, has found themselves on the receiving end of several marginal decisions, despite technology indicating otherwise.

On Day 2, Holdstock made several controversial calls, including ruling Roston Chase out LBW despite evidence suggesting a spike on UltraEdge.

Key DRS Decisions Under Scrutiny

1. Roston Chase - LBW Decision

Chase was given out LBW after a review showed a slight spike on the Snicko just before the ball hit his pad. However, Holdstock upheld the on-field decision, dismissing Chase despite indications of bat involvement.

2. Shai Hope - Caught Behind

Shai Hope was ruled out after a catch by Alex Carey. Despite replays suggesting a possible gap between the ball and Carey's gloves, Holdstock found no conclusive evidence to overturn the on-field decision.

3. Travis Head - No Review on Edge

A potential edge from Travis Head went unreviewed. Roston Chase opted for a review after keeper Shai Hope believed there was an edge, but Holdstock upheld the on-field 'not out' decision.

4. Cameron Green - LBW Appeal

Cameron Green faced a contentious LBW appeal, with replays showing a spike and deviation. However, Holdstock ruled 'not out', citing inconclusive evidence.

Social Media Backlash Against Adrian Holdstock

The series opener has sparked outrage on social media, with many fans criticizing Adrian Holdstock for his inconsistent use of DRS technology, suggesting that he has favored Australia with his decisions.

Numerous users expressed their frustration on social media platforms, calling for action against Holdstock for undermining the integrity of the DRS and claiming that West Indies have been unfairly treated.

Adrian Holdstock probably the worst umpire of this generation... Roston Chase was given out despite a clear deviation. What a shame! @ICC please take some action about this. #WIvsAUS

Mitchell Starc Comments on DRS Decisions

Australian pacer Mitchell Starc acknowledged the DRS controversies, noting that several calls have gone against West Indies. He remarked, "There’s been some interesting ones. A couple more have gone against the West Indies than us."

Starc emphasized that players can only question the decisions, as they do not control the technology used in DRS.

---